The Impact of Discourse Analysis-based Instruction on Iranian Extroverted vs. Introverted EFL Learners’ Speaking

Hossein Siahpoosh, Taher Hosseinzadeh


The main purpose of the current study was to examine the impact of discourse analysis-based instruction on Iranian extroverted vs. introverted EFL learners’ speaking.  Considering that in this study three classes of intermediate learners were used as the participants, a quasi-experimental design was used to answer the research questions of the study. The participants were selected from the students of English institute the Safir, west of Tehran Branches. The students were at intermediate level, and were chosen for this study because they had passed the basic courses in speaking skill. The total number of the students were 80 in the beginning. To have a group of homogeneous participants, first of all, they took an EPQ (Eysenck’s Personality Questionnaire) to specify their extroversion and Introversion. Next, the participants took standard Michigan Test (1982). Calculating the mean and standard deviation of the scores, 60 intermediate level students were selected as the participants in this study.  To fulfill the aims of this study, three instruments were used: a standard Michigan Test (1982), an EPQ test and speaking test.  As this is a quantitative research and needs statistics to analyze the data, SPSS (Version 23) was used to gain the essential information for proving or rejecting the null hypotheses of the research. Descriptive statistics of the study may include the mean scores of the participants, standard deviation and variance of the scores in the groups. After ensuring the normality of the data through One-sample Kolmogrove-Smirnow test, the one-way ANOVA was used to analyze the data. The result of the study revealed that discourse analysis-based instruction does not have any statistically significant effect on Iranian introverted EFL learners’ speaking, but it has statistically significant effect on Iranian extroverted EFL learners’ speaking. Therefore, there is statistically significant differences in speaking between introverted versus extroverted EFL learners using discourse analysis-based instruction.


Discourse analysis instruction, extroversion, introversion, speaking

Full Text:



Alsoraihi, M. H. (2019). Bridging the Gap between Discourse Analysis and Language Classroom Practice. English Language Teaching, 12(8), 79-88.

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4), 207-217.

Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge university press.

Carter, R. (2003). Language Awareness. ELT journal, 57(1), 64-65.

Chambers, A. (2007). Language learning as discourse analysis: Implications for the LSP learning environment. ASp. la revue du GERAS, (51-52), 35-51.

Chaudron, L. (2008). The effectiveness of second language strategy instruction: A metaâ€analysis. Language Learning, 61(4), 993-1038.

Cook, G. (1990). Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Crozier, G. (2001). Hard to reach parents or hard to reach schools? A discussion of home—school relations, with particular reference to Bangladeshi and Pakistani parents. British Educational Research Journal, 33(3), 295-313.

Demo, D. A. (2001). Discourse analysis for language teachers (Report No. ED456672). ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics Washington DC. ERIC Digest. Retrieved from ERIC database.

Fauzan, U. (2017). Inducing critical discourse analysis in speaking syllabus for EFL students of Indonesian Islamic Universities.

Fauziati, E. (2011). Interlanguage and error fossilization: a study of Indonesian students learning English as a foreign. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 23-38.

Jin, L., Singh, M., & Li, L. (2005). Communicative language teaching in China: Misconceptions, applications and perceptions. A paper presented at AARE 05 Education Research. Parramatta, Sydney

Khabiri, M., & Hajimaghsoodi, A. (2012). The Effect of Discourse Analysis-based Instruction on Iranian EFL Learners‟ Reading Comprehension. American Journal of Scientific Research, 66, 23-36.

McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2014). Language as discourse: Perspectives for language teaching. Routledge.

Myers, I., & Myers, P. B. (1995). Gifts differing: Understanding personality type. Language Learning, 3(11), 42-63.

Myers, I., McCaulley, M. H., Quenk, N. L., & Hammer, A. L. (2009). MBTI Manual; A guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Instrument. Journal of Personality, 5(3), 25-41.

Olshtain, E., & Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Discourse Analysis and Language Teaching. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 707ñ 724). Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Inc.

Rashidi, N., & Rafieerad, M. (2010). Analyzing patterns of classroom interaction in EFL classrooms in Iran. Journal of Asia TEFL, 7(3).

Susikaran, R. (2012). The role of a teacher in improving speaking skills through classroom activities. Retrieved on July 24th, 2014, from:

Tabrizi, A. R. N., Gupta, D., & Saxena, M. (2014). Discourse analysis in the ESL classroom. Beyond Words, 2(1), 72-89.

Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (2003). Developing materials for language teaching. A&C Black.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research