An Analysis of Graffiti as a Communicative Strategy in ‎Selected Public Boarding Secondary Schools ‎

Jepchirchir Kigen, Phylis Bartoo, Lucy Wathika


This study is an investigation of graffiti written by secondary school students on walls of school buildings and on top of desks. There has been rampant writing of graffiti by students despite the existence of other channels of communication in their schools. Analysis of these graffiti may be an opportunity to understand them with the aim of assisting them overcome the challenges they face. The study described the types of graffiti used by students. The study was guided by Critical Discourse Analysis as its theoretical framework. The research design adopted descriptive survey design. Simple random sampling was used to obtain the graffiti to be analyzed from each theme.  Systematic random sampling was used to select two students in purely boys and girls schools. Stratified random sampling and systematic random sampling was used in mixed schools to select a boy and a girl from each form in a school to take part in focus group discussion. The study employed Critical Discourse Analysis approach to analyze the graffiti. The results indicated that the most common types of graffiti written by students were gang graffiti, tag graffiti and existential graffiti. The findings of this research contribute to linguistic knowledge in the area of sociolinguistics. In addition, this knowledge helps school administrators to make improvements in the management of the secondary schools by identifying new ideas which they may use to make communication effective and possibly control problems before they get out of hand


graffiti, types of graffiti, text, communicative strategies

Full Text:



Arcioni, E. (2003). Graffiti, Regulation, Freedom. Graffiti and Disorder: Local ‎Government, Law Enforcement and Community Responses, Royal on the Park, ‎Brisbane. Journal of American Culture, 27, 86-99. ‎

Bartolomeo, B.J. (2001). Psychology Graffiti is part of us. (Anthropology Honours ‎Thesis). New York: Union College.‎

Blommaert, J. & Bulcaen, C. (2000). Critical Discourse Analysis. Annual Reviews ‎Publishers, 29, 447-466.‎

Chaffee, L. (1990). The Popular Culture Political Persuasion in Paraguay: ‎Communication and Public Art. Studies in Latin American Popular Culture, 127-‎‎148.‎

Dickinson, M. (2008). The making of space, race and place: New York City's war on ‎graffiti, 1970—The present. Critique of Anthropology, 28(1), 27-45.‎

Israel, D. G. (2009). Determining sample size. Publication No. PEOD 6. Retrieved on 20th ‎may 2015 from

McGregor, S.L.T. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis: A primer. Hslifax. Mount Saint ‎Vincent.‎

Mugenda, O. (1999). Research method: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Nairobi: ‎Nairobi African Center for Technology. ‎

Mugenda, O.M. & Mugenda, G.D. (2003). Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative ‎approaches. Nairobi: ACTS Press.‎

Mwangi, F.G. (2012). Graffiti Writing and its likely Influence on English Language ‎Learning in Selected Secondary schools in the Larger Laikipia East District, Laikipia ‎County. (Unpublished Master thesis). Kenyatta University, Kenya.‎

Nwoye ,O. (1993). Social Issues on Walls: Graffiti in University Lavatories Discourse and ‎Society, 4(4), 419 -442.‎

Obeng, S. G. (2000). Doing Politics on Walls and Doors: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of ‎Graffiti in Legon (Ghana). Multilingua, 19(4), 337-365. ‎

Rothman, E. (2002). Graffiti art therapy. New York: Janice Hoshino.‎

Shilubane, N. H. (2009). Chapter 3 research methodology – Unisa Institutional Repository. ‎Retrieved on 4th march 2015 from ‎‎

Tracy, S. K. (2005). The graffiti method. Australian Midwifery Journal, 18(3), 22-26.‎

Van Dijk, T.A. (2006). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. University of Amsterdam.‎

Whitehead, J. (2004). Graffiti: The use of the familiar. Art Education, 57 (6), 25-32.‎

Wodak, R. (2009). Aspects of Critical Discourse Analysis. Sage Publications.‎

Yieke, F. (2004). Graffiti: Communication Avenues for Women in the Workplace. In C. ‎Creighton & F. Yieke (Eds), Gender Inequalities in Kenya, Paris: UNESCO.‎


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research