Cultural and Academic Challenges that International Students Face While Studying Japanese Language at a British University
Abstract
Lower track is not very familiar when discussing university students. However, there are lower track students in university language classes and the language teachers recognize them. This study focuses on lower track Chinese students’ who had behavioral problems went through cultural and academic challenges. Two aims of this study are: to identify the characteristics of Chinese and British educational cultures and; to ascertain if the Chinese students are able to reach average ability through the use of an experimental class. Participants are 3 Chinese second year undergraduate students who were studying Intermediate Japanese at a university in the South of England in 2017 for a duration of one semester. Students’ behavioral changes were observed before and after the experimental study. Two types of observations were used. The results of the cultural challenges showed that students went through the educational culture which is the opposite end of the spectrum. The results of academic challenge, lower track students who could not participate in class activities were able to participate toward the end of the semester. It was concluded that Chinese lower track students were able to reach the average level.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adey, P., Csapo, B. Demetriou, A. Hautamaki, J. & Shyer, M. (2007). Can we be intelligent about intelligence? Why education needs the concept of plastic general ability. Educational Research Review. 2, 75-97.
Baskerville, R. F. (2003). Hofstede never studied culture. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(1), 1–14.
Boaler, J. (1997a). “Setting, social class and the survival of the quickest.” British Educational Research Journal. 23, 575-595.
Boaler, J. (1997b). “When even the winners are losers: evaluation the experiences of ‘top set’ students.” Journal of Curriculum Studies. 29, 165-182. doi: 10.1080/002202797184116
Boaler, J. (1997c). Experiencing school mathematics: teaching styles, sex and setting. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Brown, A. L. (1994). The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher, 23(8), 4-12.
Charnock, K. (2010). The right to reticence. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(5), 543-552.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2013). “Integrating intercultural competence into language learning through technology.” Language Learning & Technology. 17(2), 1-11.
Hammer, M. R. (2005). The Intercultural Conflict Style inventory: A conceptual framework and measure of intercultural conflict resolution approaches. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(6), 675-695.
Hinkel, E. (1991), Culture in Second language Teaching and Learning, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J. & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations – Software of the mind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in inter-cultural education. Language learning. 16(1&2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x
Kapoor, S., Hughes, P. C, Baldwin, J. R. & Blue, J. (2003). The relationship of individualism –collectivism and self-construal’s to communication styles in India and the United States, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(6), 683-700.
Kaye, D. L. (2006). International students as (un)bounded sojourners: Emergent articulations of culture and identity through intercultural communication. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Kim, M. S. (1994). Cross-cultural comparison of the perceived importance of conversational constraints. Human Communication Research. 21, 128-151.
Kirkman, B. L., K. B. Lowe, & C. B. Gibson. (2006). A quarter century of Culture’s Consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3), 285–320.
http://dx.doi. org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400202
Merkin, R., Taras, V. & Steel, P. (2014). State of the art themes in cross-cultural communication research: A systematic and meta-analytic review. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 38, 1-23.
McDermott, R. (1977). “Social Relations as Contexts for Learning in School.” Harvard Educational Review. 47(2), 198-213.
McSweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith – A failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55(1), 89–118
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage publications.
Oakes, J. (1982). “The reproduction of inequity: the content of secondary school tracking.” The Urban Review. 14(2), 107-20.
Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping Track. How Schools Structure Inequality. London: Yale University Press.
Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L., & Sparks, K. (2001). An international study of the psychometric properties of the Hofstede Values Survey Module 1994: A comparison of individual and country/province level results. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(2), 269–281.
Taras, V., & Steel, P. (2009). Beyond Hofstede: Challenging the ten testaments of cross-cultural research. In C. Nakata (Ed.), Beyond Hofstede: Culture frameworks for global marketing and management (pp. 40–61). Chicago: Macmillan/Palgrave.
Tan, C. (2017). Teaching critical thinking: Cultural challenges and strategies in Singapore. British Educational Research Journal. 43(5), 987-1002.
Younman, J. & Kaylani, C. T. (1996). “ESP Program Design for Mixed Level Students. English for Specific Purpose.” 15(4), 311-324.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research